Translate

Tupac Amaru Shakur, " I'm Loosing It...We MUST Unite!"

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Issa Rae jokes about mannequin sex on ‘Insecure’ after TV clip goes viral

A viewer shared footage on TikTok of the latex human-doll being used during a kissing scene with actor Lawrence Saint-Victor.

Producers of The Bold and The Beautiful are taking quite a creepy approach to filming intimate scenes while following safety protocols amid the ongoing coronavirus crisis.  

A viewer shared footage on TikTok of a mannequin used in place of actress Kiara Barnes during a kissing scene with actor Lawrence Saint-Victor.

“The Bold and The Beautiful got their cast making out with mannequins during Covid,” the user wrote.

Read More: Issa Rae, HBO partner for Black TV history documentary

Once the clip went viral, many Twitter users mocked the scene and had plenty of jokes, including Insecure creator/star Issa Rae. She retweeted the video with the caption, “Can’t wait to f—- some mannequins this season.”

Watch the scene via the clip below:

Barnes replied to Rae’s comment, writing, “Yoooo let me tell you how awkward this was to film.”

Bradley Bell, an executive producer on the show told the New York Times, “At first, we took out the love scenes, and the show was falling a little flat because we’re all about romance and family interactions,” he said. “One of the first ideas we had was to bring in mannequins for the intimate scenes and hospital scenes, and it’s working quite well — we’re shooting it from a great distance or in a way you can’t see the form is inanimate.”

According to reports, The Bold and the Beautiful have been shooting intimate scenes with mannequins since early this summer. 

In related news, Rae is set to make appearances during the Primetime Emmys awards show later this month. She joins already confirmed stars Anthony Anderson, America Ferrera, Gabrielle Union, J.J. Watt, Lena Waithe and Oprah Winfrey on the Sept. 20 show.

The 72nd Emmy Awards will be hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, will  broadcast at 5 p.m. PT/8 p.m. ET on Sept. 20 on ABC.

Have you subscribed to theGrio’s podcast “Dear Culture”? Download our newest episodes now!

The post Issa Rae jokes about mannequin sex on ‘Insecure’ after TV clip goes viral appeared first on TheGrio.



from TheGrio https://ift.tt/35rJT7B

Janet Hubert joins Will Smith, ‘Fresh Prince’ cast for HBO Max reunion

The stars had an ‘a candid conversation’ for the first time in 27 years.

Will Smith reunited with his Fresh Prince of Bel-Air castmates on Thursday for a HBO Max special celebrating the TV show’s 30th anniversary.

Smith, Daphne Maxwell Reid, DJ Jazzy Jeff, Joseph Marcelli, Karyn Parsons, Alfonso Ribiero, and Tatyana Ali gathered on Sept. 10, to tape the show exactly 30 years since the beloved comedy first aired in the US. 

Smith shared a photo on his Instagram of the cast reunited on the set of the show, promising a “real Banks Family Reunion”. He added: “RIP James.”

James Avery, who played uncle Phil, died in 2013.

Read More: ‘Fresh Prince of Bel-Air’ drama reboot to stream on Peacock

Smith also had an “emotional reunion and a candid conversation,” with Janet Hubert for the first time in 27 years. The actress played his Aunt Viv on Fresh Prince before she was replaced by Reid.

Smith and Hubert had not spoken in decades, and over the years she has used her social media platform to take shots at the actor, as well as Ribeiro, who played her son Carlton on the series.

Hubert apparently blames Smith for spreading a rumor that she was fired from the hit show after three seasons. 

Back in 2018, she addressed Smith directly in a video, alleging she was blackballed in the industry after her stint on Fresh Prince. 

“My life when you banished me and when you tainted me and when you put your poison in, you poisoned my entire world…Every time I try to have a meeting … every time I try to call Oprah for help, Oprah’s people would say, ‘No she’s friends with will and Janet will never be on the show … we can’t promote her on the show because she has a very deep, profound friendship with Will,” she said.

Adding, “Well, if somebody said your mama’s a hoe and then that reputation follows you and follows you and follows you and follows you, your mama becomes a hoe.”

Fresh Prince thegrio.com
Fresh Prince

At one point, Hubert said, “I’m just a woman who played a s—y role on a sitcom which, dear God, I wish I hadn’t. The one thing I do regret in my life was ever taking that role to have to have worked with someone like you.” 

The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air ran for six seasons on NBC from 1990-1996. As theGrio reported, it was announced earlier this year that the reboot, a darker, more dramatic take on the original, would happen. Smith and the show’s original creators, Andy and Susan Borowitz, along with its original producers, Quincy Jones, and Benny Medina will be on board.

Have you subscribed to theGrio’s podcast “Dear Culture”? Download our newest episodes now!

[jwp-video n=”1″

The post Janet Hubert joins Will Smith, ‘Fresh Prince’ cast for HBO Max reunion appeared first on TheGrio.



from TheGrio https://ift.tt/32jGsyc

What did Trump know and when did he know it? Inside his Feb. 7 admission


By the time President Donald Trump privately told journalist Bob Woodward on Feb. 7 that the coronavirus was “deadly stuff” transmitted by air, a threat “more deadly” than the flu, the warnings around him had been rampant.

National security adviser Robert O’Brien had told Trump that Covid-19 would be the “largest national security crisis of your presidency.” Top trade adviser Peter Navarro was drafting urgent pleas to manufacture more medical supplies and personal protective gear in the U.S. Other worried senior aides were organizing meetings about the potential severity and spread of a pandemic.

Yet Trump continued to downplay the threat publicly — comparing it to the typical flu, insisting the virus would disappear quickly and offering frequent praise for China’s response. The president appeared committed to keeping the public focused on more upbeat matters such as the rising stock market.

New revelations from Trump’s interviews with Woodward early in the crisis are raising a new set of questions that are threatening to swamp his administration and campaign just over 50 days from the November election. While Trump keeps trying to turn attention toward his favorite issues — culture wars, law and order or new promises to his base like potential conservative judicial appointees — Woodward’s book and the timeline it presents has forced the Trump administration into precisely the position it’s wanted to avoid: litigating the early stages of its response to a pandemic that has now killed more than 190,000 Americans.

Some White House aides privately acknowledge it was a wasted month. Democrats and other critics say the delay in giving out timely and clear information — especially after those fateful days in early February — caused untold thousands more deaths than necessary and deeper economic wreckage than the U.S. might have endured if it had responded earlier.

“This is the same man, Donald Trump, who for days, weeks, if not months thereafter calls it a hoax, dismissed the seriousness of it to the point he suggested people should not wear masks. He knew it was airborne, that people would breathe it,” Democratic vice presidential nominee, Kamala Harris, said Thursday.



That early response from Trump, top White House aides and health officials across the administration now shows a different picture than the president was presenting to the public. Senior administration officials argue they were all scrambling to figure out the nature of the virus, with the severity of it slowly coming into focus later in February.

During his Friday night phone call, Trump unexpectedly kept bringing up the virus. Woodward had initially asked Trump about his plans for the next eight to 10 months following impeachment, as he wrote in his book “Rage.” Trump turned the conversation to the virus and displayed far greater technical knowledge of it than he let on in public.

“You just breathe the air and that’s how it’s passed,” Trump said in the Feb. 7 call. “And so that’s a very tricky one. That’s a very delicate one. It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flus.”

Trump did not share these growing concerns, or even basic public health guidance with the American public at that time, preferring instead to present what he has called a calm front.

“The fact is, there has to be a calmness. You don't want me jumping up and down screaming there's going to be great death. There's going to—. And really causing serious problems for the country,” Trump told reporters in a White House press briefing on Thursday as he defended himself from a growing furor over what his critics decry as covering up a threat to American lives.

“When I say it was airborne, everybody knew it was airborne. This is no big thing,” he said moments earlier.

Here's what happened in the White House in the days leading up to that phone call between Trump and Woodward.

From ‘under control’ to ‘very tricky’

The gap between the public and private messaging started weeks earlier. As soon as the president returned from an economic conference in Davos, Switzerland, in late January — where Trump dismissed concerns about the coronavirus and said “we have it totally under control” — more than a dozen aides gathered in the office of then-acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney to talk through the virus and chart out the U.S. response.

In the days leading up to the Feb. 7 call with Woodward, Trump’s health officials had raced to get a handle on key elements of the emerging epidemic, including how quickly the virus was spreading and by what means. Some had grown increasingly concerned about the prospect of infected people with no symptoms passing on the virus in greater numbers than initially anticipated.

The coronavirus by early February had sickened more than 30,000 people in mainland China and killed at least 600, an outbreak worrying enough that the White House’s nascent coronavirus task force — launched in late January — had begun regularly briefing Congress and the press on its progression.

Top administration health officials largely sought to soothe the public, repeatedly insisting that the “immediate threat” to the nation was low and encouraging people to take only basic preventative measures. On Feb. 7, the U.S. had identified just more than a dozen Covid-19 cases — only two of which were people who had not just returned from China.

“Our goal is to keep it that way,” CDC Director Robert Redfield said of the low case count during a briefing that day, adding later that “the real threat to the American public right now is the flu.”



It’s now known there were already more cases in the U.S. — and it was coming from places besides China. But the U.S. government was not looking for it, and the inept start to testing haunts the U.S. response to this day.

Within the administration’s new task force, officials were similarly focused more on the conditions abroad. The group led then by HHS Secretary Alex Azar had prioritized imposing new screening measures at airports and rushed to quarantine those returning from hard-hit Chinese provinces, hoping to prevent infection from circulating more broadly throughout the country.

Top infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci in late January had initially downplayed the possibility of asymptomatic cases becoming a major driver of the virus’ spread, citing the experience of past respiratory outbreaks. But by Feb. 7, health officials had grown far more cautious as more asymptomatic reports around the world began to emerge. “We are working as quickly as possible on the many unanswered questions about this virus,” HHS Secretary Alex Azar said at the time. “That includes exactly how it spreads, how deadly it is, whether it’s commonly transmitted by patients not yet displaying symptoms.”

Shortly afterward, Redfield offered a blunter view, telling reporters that it was “very clear that individuals that don’t have symptoms can in fact transmit the virus.” (The CDC offered stark warnings that month, with one top official on Feb. 25 saying “disruption to everyday life might be severe” — a statement that drew a backlash from Trump himself and marked the end of briefings at the CDC for months.)

Trump defeats the ‘political hoax’

During that week of Feb. 7, Trump at least publicly appeared to be consumed by other matters at the White House.

He delivered a Hollywood-worthy State of the Union address on Feb. 4, with surprise guests and the awarding of the U.S. Medal of Freedom to controversial conservative radio talk show host, Rush Limbaugh.

The Senate acquitted him on two articles of impeachment on Wednesday, Feb. 5., a move that emboldened him to strike down and fire critics and remake the administration even more to his liking.

“My recollection of that whole period, what a colossal waste of time impeachment was,” said Joe Grogan, the former assistant to the president for domestic policy who ran the Domestic Policy Council. “The Democrats should hang their heads in shame on a total goat show. They were briefed on Covid, too, and if they want to bitch and moan the president was not paying attention, he was paying a hell of a lot more attention than they were.”



Feb. 7 was a busy Friday for the White House with the president eager to continue his post-impeachment victory lap. Trump left a rainy Washington mid-morning to deliver a speech in Charlotte, N.C., on the economy and Opportunity Zones.

But first he walked over to reporters outside the White House holding a stack of papers he declared was an important decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out emoluments claims against Trump and his hotel.

“I'll be reading it on the helicopter, but it was a total win,” Trump said. “It was another phony case.”

Trump railed against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who ripped up his State of the Union speech, and accused her of breaking the law. He called his impeachment trial a “political hoax” and bragged about the monthly job numbers.

Amid internal worries, Trump praises China

Internally at the White House, some officials were asking questions about a lack of information about how much personal protective equipment was available in the United States. In a series of memos to the Task Force days later, beginning on Feb. 9, Navarro requested immediate action on N-95 mask production, the use of remdesivir as a possible therapeutic, and the need of a “Manhattan Project” effort towards vaccine development.

At the time, several White House aides dismissed Navarro’s memos as overly dramatic — though now, they look more prescient.

“The Never-Trumpers in the media are both misreading the Woodward book and missing the president’s strategy,” Navarro told POLITICO. “Through mid-March, China was hiding critical information.... In this fog of China Virus war, the president’s clear strategy was ‘hope for the best, prepare for the worst, stay calm, and attack the virus.’”

Although top national security advisers, health officials and Navarro recognized the seriousness of the virus, the lack of a clear policy making process bedeviled the response, and members of the coronavirus task force, then run by HHS chief Azar, were chafing under Azar’s leadership. Vice President Mike Pence later replaced him as the head of the task force.

“We weren’t running a normal process,” a former administration official recalled. “It’s like you practice all year for the big football game and you have these plays you know will work and run all year, and practice, practice, practice, but then it’s the fourth quarter, the game is tied, you have three minutes to win and you start making up plays on the fly. You put random players in. Your star quarterback who has been throwing the ball all year sits on the sidelines. What are we even doing? We panicked.”

The focus of the U.S. response was elsewhere. During those first days of February, in one of the administration’s biggest actions of the week, the State Department announced it had rushed nearly 18 tons of privately donated medical supplies to China — a haul that included the kinds of masks, gloves and protective equipment that the U.S. itself would find itself sorely needing just weeks later.


Yet even as top officials projected confidence, that first week of February left some in the administration unsettled over what they did not yet know for sure about the virus. China had continued to withhold permission for a visit from a global team of health experts that the U.S. saw at the time as crucial to better understanding the brand new virus — a stalemate that health officials had already spent weeks trying to break.

Toward the end of Trump’s gaggle with reporters, before he turned away to board Marine One, a reporter asked him to answer a question on China.

“Are you concerned that China is covering up the full extent of the coronavirus?” A reporter yelled through the hum of the chopper.

“No. China is working very hard,” Trump said, and recounted his conversation the night before with Chinese President Xi Jinping. “They're working really hard, and I think they are doing a very professional job.”

The president brushed off a question about whether he had any concerns about the potential impact on the global economy.

“I think that China will do a very good job,” Trump said.

The exchange demonstrated the extent to which the president wanted to preserve his warmer relationship with China despite the warnings being delivered from some of his top advisers. Only weeks before, the president signed a truce he called a “sea change in international trade” that reined in a trade war between Washington and Beijing that lasted over 18 months.

Just the day before, the physician who first raised alarms about the coronavirus in Wuhan, Dr. Li Wenliang, died of the disease, as well as a U.S. citizen in Wuhan. And top officials scrambled to evacuate more American citizens from Wuhan to Travis Air Force Base in California where they were forced to quarantine.

Payback?

Once he returned from North Carolina, Trump’s focus remained on cleanup inside his White House on another matter.

That night, Trump swiftly — and unexpectedly — removed two of the most prominent witnesses in his impeachment trial. Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council staff member, was escorted off White House grounds and Gordon Sondland, a donor turned ambassador to the European Union, was pulled from his post.

Reporters called out questions about “retaliation” and “payback” as the president returned from his trip.

Trump flashed a thumbs up.

Then he headed into the White House, where he later made his call to Woodward.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/2RgU3zY
via 400 Since 1619

Ukraine gas company to add Rick Perry pick to board


The Ukraine state-owned natural gas company caught up in President Donald Trump’s impeachment investigation has appointed a U.S. businessman pushed by former Energy Secretary Rick Perry to its board, two people with direct knowledge of the decision told POLITICO on Thursday.

Houston-based oil and gas executive Robert Bensh is set join the board of Naftogaz, pending final paperwork, the two people said, adding that his appointment has drawn opposition from some other board members. They said the move has led at least one of them, Amos Hochstein, to prepare to resign.

The Ukraine government informed Naftogaz last week that it had approved Bensh, two people with knowledge said.

The appointment adds to questions about Perry’s role in Ukrainian energy politics and whether the former Texas governor had pressured the government there to buy U.S. energy supplies to win favor with the Trump administration. Perry, as first reported by POLITICO, had originally pushed Naftogaz to accept Bensh and another Perry associate, Texas oil and gas executive with ties to Ukraine, Michael Bleyzer, onto its board.

More recently, Time.com and WNYC-ProPubliica on Thursday reported that federal prosecutors had probed Perry‘s efforts to broker a $20 billion contract for a company called Louisiana Natural Gas Exports to deliver U.S. liquefied natural gas to Naftogaz. The report said Bensh had promoted the company as one that the Ukrainian government could hire to deliver natural gas to the country.

Louisiana Natural Gas Exports did not own any assets or produce gas at the time it was seeking the contract, and instead sought to obtain the gas from a Houston-based company called Energy Transfer Partners. Perry served on the board of Energy Transfer before joining the Trump administration and returned to that role shortly after stepping down last year.

One person with direct knowledge of the probe confirmed to POLITICO that federal prosecutors in New York had looked last winter into whether Perry pushed the Ukraine government to sign the contract with Louisiana Natural Gas Exports. Time.com reported that the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York has since dropped the probe. The prosecutors' office did not immediately reply to POLITICO's request for comment.

The Ukrainian government had wanted to replace Hochstein with Bensh last year “as a deliverable” to Perry and Trump, the person added, but backed off amid the political turmoil that erupted after POLITICO reported that the Trump administration was withholding military aid to Ukraine to force the government there to announce an investigation into Biden’s son Hunter. That pressure from the White House prompted Democrats to launch their impeachment into Trump.

Time.com said the Ukrainian government balked at signing a $20 billion contract with Louisiana Natural Gas Exports because of concerns about its management. It later dropped the discussions after Perry stepped down and U.S. presidential election polling made it unclear whether Trump would win a second term, the news site reported.

Spokespeople for the Energy Department and Energy Transfer Partners did not immediately return requests for comment. Bensh declined to comment on the record.

A spokesperson for Perry criticized the report as "a continuing effort to create a story that doesn’t exist. It’s just another failed attempt to rewrite history, this time two months out from a Presidential election. Time should be ashamed of publishing this ridiculous story.”

Louisiana Natural Gas Exports also in June 2020 sent a letter to the Turkey-U.S. Business Council in Istanbul, pitching itself as a possible supplier of liquefied natural gas to that country, according to a filing under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

“We welcome the opportunity, under the leadership of President Erdogan and by working with [the council], of being part of the enhancement of Turkey’s strategic energy supply through increased imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the United States,” LNGE Chief Executive Ben Blanchet wrote.

Louisiana Natural Gas Exports did not immediately reply to a phone call seeking comment.



from Politics, Policy, Political News Top Stories https://ift.tt/35oyhCm
via 400 Since 1619

‘Cuties’ director received death threats after Netflix marketing campaign

Maïmouna Doucouré said the poster released by the streaming giant was ‘not representative of the film.’

Filmmaker Maïmouna Doucouré has responded to the controversy surrounding her French film Cuties, and the death threats she’s receiving over the coming-of-age drama.  

The story centers on 11-year-old Senegalese immigrant Amy (Fathia Youssouf), who is living in Paris and finds escape from her conservative Muslim upbringing by joining a dance group that wants to go viral on the internet.

The poster Netflix chose to announce the film’s U.S. release back in August finds the young stars in suggestive costumes and provocative poses. The imagery sparked immediate backlash, The Huffington Post reports.

Read More: Netflix to debut heartbreaking doc ‘A Love Song for Latasha’

Doucouré has received death threats over the poster, with many accusing her of promoting child pedophilia and sexualizing underage girls. Check out the poster below.

The French version of the poster shows the prepubescent protagonists having fun, while the Netflix poster has sparked a campaign on social media calling for the removal of the film from the streaming platform. 

Doucouré said she intended to make a provocative film about the negative impact of pop culture imagery on children. She called Cuties the “story of many children who have to navigate between a liberal western culture and a conservative culture at home.”

“I wrote this film after I spent a year and a half interviewing pre-adolescent girls, trying to understand their notion of what femininity was, and how social media was affecting this idea,” Doucouré told Deadline.

“The main message of the film is that these young girls should have the time to be children, to enjoy their childhood, and have the time to choose who they want to be when they are adults. You have a choice, you can navigate between these cultures and choose from the elements of both, to develop into your own self, despite what social media dictates in our society.”

Doucouré said the poster Netflix released in August to promote Cuties was “not representative of the film.”  She received a formal apology from Co-CEO Ted Sarandos for its choice of marketing. 

“We had several discussions back and forth after this happened. Netflix apologized publicly, and also personally to me,” Doucouré shared.

But the damage has already been done. 

Petitions are calling for the film’s removal from Netflix, describing it as “child pornography,” and #CancelNetflix trended on social media a day after the film’s release on Sept. 9.

“I received numerous attacks on my character from people who had not seen the film, who thought I was actually making a film that was apologetic about hypersexualization of children,” Doucouré said. “I also received numerous death threats.”

A recent review by The New Yorker suggested the film is the target of a “right-wing campaign.” 

“The subject of ‘Cuties’ isn’t twerking; it’s children, especially poor and nonwhite children, who are deprived of the resources — the education, the emotional support, the open family discussion — to put sexualized media and pop culture into perspective,” wrote reviewer Richard Brody.

Cuties has been praised by film critics and it earned Doucouré an award for directing at the Sundance Film Festival in January. 

Have you subscribed to theGrio’s podcast “Dear Culture”? Download our newest episodes now!

The post ‘Cuties’ director received death threats after Netflix marketing campaign appeared first on TheGrio.



from TheGrio https://ift.tt/3kaeX03

Black Faith

  • Who are you? - Ever since I saw the first preview of the movie, Overcomer, I wanted to see it. I was ready. Pumped. The release month was etched in my mind. When the time...
    5 years ago

Black Business

Black Fitness

Black Fashion

Black Travel

Black Notes

Interesting Black Links

Pride & Prejudice: Exploring Black LGBTQ+ Histories and Cultures

  In the rich tapestry of history, the threads of Black LGBTQ+ narratives have often been overlooked. This journey into their stories is an ...